| Finał KM MZBS 2012 104: K Pawlikaniec | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | L Brylski-L Urbańczyk,J Kurianowicz-* | 1 | WE | 2![]() | E | K | -1 | -50 | 7.14% | 7.14% | ||
| L Brylski-L Urbańczyk,J Kurianowicz-* | 2 | WE | 5 × | W | Q | -2 | -300 | 21.43% | 14.29% | |||
| L Brylski-L Urbańczyk,J Kurianowicz-* | 3 | WE | 2![]() | E | Q | -1 | -100 | 85.71% | 38.10% | |||
| 2 | A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak,J Kurianowicz-* | 4 | WE | 4![]() | N | 4 | +1 | -650 | 57.14% | 42.86% | ||
| A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak,J Kurianowicz-* | 5 | WE | 4![]() | W | 3 | +1 | +450 | 14.29% | 37.14% | |||
| A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak,J Kurianowicz-* | 6 | WE | 4![]() | S | 7 | +1 | -450 | 14.29% | 33.33% | |||
| 3 | S Szafraniec-G Bajek,J Kurianowicz-* | 7 | WE | 4![]() | N | Q | +1 | -650 | 50.00% | 35.71% | ||
| S Szafraniec-G Bajek,J Kurianowicz-* | 8 | WE | 2 × | E | K | -4 | -800 | 0.00% | 31.25% | |||
| S Szafraniec-G Bajek,J Kurianowicz-* | 9 | WE | 3![]() | W | Q | +2 | +660 | 85.71% | 37.30% | |||
| 4 | A Winkler-J Molenda,J Kurianowicz-* | 10 | WE | 2![]() | W | Q | +1 | +110 | 85.71% | 42.14% | ||
| A Winkler-J Molenda,J Kurianowicz-* | 11 | WE | 3![]() | S | Q | +2 | -460 | 42.86% | 42.21% | |||
| A Winkler-J Molenda,J Kurianowicz-* | 12 | WE | 4![]() | E | J | = | +420 | 28.57% | 41.07% | |||
| 5 | J Kurianowicz-*,R Menzfeld-W Dębiczak | 13 | NS | 6![]() | S | K | = | +1370 | 71.43% | 43.41% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,R Menzfeld-W Dębiczak | 14 | NS | 3![]() | S | J | +4 | +520 | 92.86% | 46.94% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,R Menzfeld-W Dębiczak | 15 | NS | 4![]() | E | K | = | -420 | 42.86% | 46.67% | |||
| 6 | J Kurianowicz-*,E Kasiński-M Rzeszutek | 16 | NS | 3![]() | N | 3 | +1 | +430 | 92.86% | 49.55% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,E Kasiński-M Rzeszutek | 17 | NS | 3![]() | N | 8 | +3 | +490 | 0.00% | 46.64% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,E Kasiński-M Rzeszutek | 18 | NS | 4![]() | W | 10 | +2 | -480 | 0.00% | 44.05% | |||
| 7 | J Kurianowicz-*,P Krawczyk-B Wegner | 19 | NS | 2![]() | W | 5 | +2 | -130 | 42.86% | 43.98% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,P Krawczyk-B Wegner | 20 | NS | 2![]() | W | 2 | -1 | +100 | 100.00% | 46.79% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,P Krawczyk-B Wegner | 21 | NS | 5![]() | W | A | -1 | +50 | 100.00% | 49.32% | |||
| 8 | M Drecki-T Kowalik,J Kurianowicz-* | 22 | WE | 1![]() | S | J | +3 | -180 | 7.14% | 47.40% | ||
| M Drecki-T Kowalik,J Kurianowicz-* | 23 | WE | 3![]() | S | Q | = | -110 | 42.86% | 47.20% | |||
| M Drecki-T Kowalik,J Kurianowicz-* | 24 | WE | 1![]() | E | Q | +3 | +180 | 71.43% | 48.21% | |||
| 9 | J Kurianowicz-*,A Poznysz-W Sękowski | 25 | NS | 5 × | S | Q | -1 | -100 | 0.00% | 46.29% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,A Poznysz-W Sękowski | 26 | NS | 4 × | S | K | = | +790 | 100.00% | 48.35% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,A Poznysz-W Sękowski | 27 | NS | 2![]() | S | J | +2 | +170 | 35.71% | 47.88% | |||
| 10 | J Kurianowicz-*,S Zimniak-W Siuda | 28 | NS | 4![]() | W | K | +1 | -450 | 42.86% | 47.70% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,S Zimniak-W Siuda | 29 | NS | 1![]() | E | 5 | -2 | +200 | 78.57% | 48.77% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,S Zimniak-W Siuda | 30 | NS | 4![]() | N | 4 | +1 | +450 | 42.86% | 48.57% | |||
| 11 | J Kurianowicz-*,J Dzięcielski-T Pogwizd | 1 | NS | 4![]() | E | A | -1 | +50 | 42.86% | 48.39% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,J Dzięcielski-T Pogwizd | 2 | NS | 6![]() | N | A | -1 | -100 | 21.43% | 47.54% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,J Dzięcielski-T Pogwizd | 3 | NS | 4![]() | W | 3 | = | -620 | 64.29% | 48.05% | |||
| 12 | J Kurianowicz-*,S Janiak-A Augustyniak | 4 | NS | 4![]() | E | A | -1 | +100 | 71.43% | 48.74% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,S Janiak-A Augustyniak | 5 | NS | 4![]() | W | K | -1 | +50 | 64.29% | 49.18% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,S Janiak-A Augustyniak | 6 | NS | 2![]() | N | 8 | +2 | +170 | 57.14% | 49.40% | |||
| 13 | R Surowiak-B Nowakowski,J Kurianowicz-* | 7 | WE | 3![]() | S | 8 | -1 | +100 | 64.29% | 49.81% | ||
| R Surowiak-B Nowakowski,J Kurianowicz-* | 8 | WE | 3![]() | N | 5 | = | -140 | 64.29% | 50.19% | |||
| R Surowiak-B Nowakowski,J Kurianowicz-* | 9 | WE | 3![]() | W | 4 | +1 | +630 | 85.71% | 51.10% | |||
| 14 | E Szafraniec-M Czolij,J Kurianowicz-* | 10 | WE | 3![]() | N | 10 | = | -140 | 35.71% | 50.71% | ||
| E Szafraniec-M Czolij,J Kurianowicz-* | 11 | WE | 3![]() | N | 7 | = | -110 | 42.86% | 50.52% | |||
| E Szafraniec-M Czolij,J Kurianowicz-* | 12 | WE | 2![]() | W | 9 | -1 | -50 | 14.29% | 49.66% | |||
| 15 | B Leśniak-M Rajca,J Kurianowicz-* | 13 | WE | 2![]() | E | K | = | +90 | 7.14% | 48.67% | ||
| B Leśniak-M Rajca,J Kurianowicz-* | 14 | WE | 3![]() | S | K | = | -110 | 28.57% | 48.21% | |||
| B Leśniak-M Rajca,J Kurianowicz-* | 15 | WE | 6![]() | E | Q | = | +980 | 71.43% | 48.73% | |||
| SUMA: | 48.73% | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 55.12% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 50.86% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 18 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2012-12-16 o 20:10:14