Finał KM MZBS 2012 11: L Brylski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-L Urbańczyk,J Kurianowicz-K Pawlikaniec | 1 | NS | 2 | E | K | -1 | +50 | 92.86% | 92.86% | ||
*-L Urbańczyk,J Kurianowicz-K Pawlikaniec | 2 | NS | 5× | W | Q | -2 | +300 | 78.57% | 85.71% | |||
*-L Urbańczyk,J Kurianowicz-K Pawlikaniec | 3 | NS | 2 | E | Q | -1 | +100 | 14.29% | 61.90% | |||
2 | *-L Urbańczyk,J Dzięcielski-T Pogwizd | 4 | NS | 4 | N | 5 | +1 | +650 | 42.86% | 57.14% | ||
*-L Urbańczyk,J Dzięcielski-T Pogwizd | 5 | NS | 2 | W | 5 | +4 | -230 | 100.00% | 65.71% | |||
*-L Urbańczyk,J Dzięcielski-T Pogwizd | 6 | NS | 3 | S | 7 | +2 | +200 | 50.00% | 63.10% | |||
3 | *-L Urbańczyk,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 7 | NS | 4 | N | 3 | +1 | +650 | 50.00% | 61.22% | ||
*-L Urbańczyk,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 8 | NS | 3 | S | 2 | = | +400 | 64.29% | 61.61% | |||
*-L Urbańczyk,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 9 | NS | 4 | E | 2 | = | -620 | 57.14% | 61.11% | |||
4 | *-L Urbańczyk,E Kasiński-M Rzeszutek | 10 | NS | 4 | N | J | +1 | +650 | 78.57% | 62.86% | ||
*-L Urbańczyk,E Kasiński-M Rzeszutek | 11 | NS | 3 | S | Q | +2 | +460 | 57.14% | 62.34% | |||
*-L Urbańczyk,E Kasiński-M Rzeszutek | 12 | NS | 3 | W | 4 | +2 | -460 | 28.57% | 59.52% | |||
5 | A Poznysz-W Sękowski,*-L Urbańczyk | 13 | WE | 3× | N | 6 | +3 | -1350 | 71.43% | 60.44% | ||
A Poznysz-W Sękowski,*-L Urbańczyk | 14 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | +4 | -520 | 7.14% | 56.63% | |||
A Poznysz-W Sękowski,*-L Urbańczyk | 15 | WE | 2 | E | Q | +3 | +200 | 7.14% | 53.33% | |||
6 | S Zimniak-W Siuda,*-L Urbańczyk | 16 | WE | 4 | S | A | -2 | +100 | 100.00% | 56.25% | ||
S Zimniak-W Siuda,*-L Urbańczyk | 17 | WE | 6 | N | 9 | +1 | -1020 | 0.00% | 52.94% | |||
S Zimniak-W Siuda,*-L Urbańczyk | 18 | WE | 4 | W | K | +1 | +450 | 50.00% | 52.78% | |||
7 | R Surowiak-B Nowakowski,*-L Urbańczyk | 19 | WE | 2 | W | 5 | +2 | +130 | 57.14% | 53.01% | ||
R Surowiak-B Nowakowski,*-L Urbańczyk | 20 | WE | 1 | E | Q | = | +90 | 21.43% | 51.43% | |||
R Surowiak-B Nowakowski,*-L Urbańczyk | 21 | WE | 4 | W | 4 | +1 | +450 | 100.00% | 53.74% | |||
8 | S Janiak-A Augustyniak,*-L Urbańczyk | 22 | WE | 1 | N | K | +2 | -150 | 42.86% | 53.25% | ||
S Janiak-A Augustyniak,*-L Urbańczyk | 23 | WE | 4 | S | Q | -2 | +200 | 100.00% | 55.28% | |||
S Janiak-A Augustyniak,*-L Urbańczyk | 24 | WE | 1 | E | Q | +1 | +120 | 21.43% | 53.87% | |||
9 | R Menzfeld-W Dębiczak,*-L Urbańczyk | 25 | WE | 5 | S | Q | -1 | +50 | 85.71% | 55.14% | ||
R Menzfeld-W Dębiczak,*-L Urbańczyk | 26 | WE | 4 | S | K | = | -620 | 50.00% | 54.95% | |||
R Menzfeld-W Dębiczak,*-L Urbańczyk | 27 | WE | 3 | S | J | +1 | -170 | 64.29% | 55.29% | |||
10 | P Krawczyk-B Wegner,*-L Urbańczyk | 28 | WE | 4 | W | A | +1 | +450 | 57.14% | 55.36% | ||
P Krawczyk-B Wegner,*-L Urbańczyk | 29 | WE | 3 | S | J | -2 | +200 | 100.00% | 56.90% | |||
P Krawczyk-B Wegner,*-L Urbańczyk | 30 | WE | 4 | N | 9 | +1 | -450 | 57.14% | 56.90% | |||
11 | A Winkler-J Molenda,*-L Urbańczyk | 1 | WE | 5× | E | A | -2 | -300 | 7.14% | 55.30% | ||
A Winkler-J Molenda,*-L Urbańczyk | 2 | WE | 3 | S | 5 | +2 | -660 | 50.00% | 55.13% | |||
A Winkler-J Molenda,*-L Urbańczyk | 3 | WE | 4 | W | 6 | = | +620 | 35.71% | 54.55% | |||
12 | B Leśniak-M Rajca,*-L Urbańczyk | 4 | WE | 4 | E | 2 | -4 | -400 | 0.00% | 52.94% | ||
B Leśniak-M Rajca,*-L Urbańczyk | 5 | WE | 3 | S | 8 | -1 | +100 | 57.14% | 53.06% | |||
B Leśniak-M Rajca,*-L Urbańczyk | 6 | WE | 4 | N | 10 | = | -420 | 7.14% | 51.79% | |||
13 | *-L Urbańczyk,S Szafraniec-G Bajek | 7 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | -3 | -300 | 7.14% | 50.58% | ||
*-L Urbańczyk,S Szafraniec-G Bajek | 8 | NS | 3 | S | 3 | -2 | -100 | 7.14% | 49.44% | |||
*-L Urbańczyk,S Szafraniec-G Bajek | 9 | NS | 3 | W | 10 | = | -600 | 64.29% | 49.82% | |||
14 | *-L Urbańczyk,M Drecki-T Kowalik | 10 | NS | 3× | W | 9 | -1 | +200 | 85.71% | 50.71% | ||
*-L Urbańczyk,M Drecki-T Kowalik | 11 | NS | 1 | S | J | +1 | +120 | 78.57% | 51.39% | |||
*-L Urbańczyk,M Drecki-T Kowalik | 12 | NS | 2 | E | K | = | -110 | 42.86% | 51.19% | |||
15 | E Szafraniec-M Czolij,*-L Urbańczyk | 13 | WE | 2 | E | K | +1 | +110 | 42.86% | 51.00% | ||
E Szafraniec-M Czolij,*-L Urbańczyk | 14 | WE | 3 | N | K | -1 | +50 | 64.29% | 51.30% | |||
E Szafraniec-M Czolij,*-L Urbańczyk | 15 | WE | 6 | W | 7 | = | +980 | 71.43% | 51.75% | |||
SUMA: | 51.75% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 58.06% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 53.85% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 9 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2012-12-16 o 20:10:14