101: W Siuda
rakt
bieżący
4
4
K52×5552535×55×95252Q×55555×55K552955555×5555532| KM MZBS 2013 - finał 101: W Siuda | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | B Leśniak-M Rajca,M Ociesa-* | 1 | WE | 3 | W | 4 | -2 | -100 | 0.00% | 0.00% | ||
| B Leśniak-M Rajca,M Ociesa-* | 2 | WE | 2 | S | 4 | +2 | -170 | 14.29% | 7.14% | |||
| B Leśniak-M Rajca,M Ociesa-* | 3 | WE | 4 | E | K | +1 | +650 | 42.86% | 19.05% | |||
| 2 | M Ociesa-*,S Machowski-J Zajączkowski | 4 | NS | 2 | E | 5 | = | -120 | 64.29% | 30.36% | ||
| M Ociesa-*,S Machowski-J Zajączkowski | 5 | NS | 3 | E | 2 | = | -110 | 50.00% | 34.29% | |||
| M Ociesa-*,S Machowski-J Zajączkowski | 6 | NS | 3× | N | 5 | +1 | +650 | 100.00% | 45.24% | |||
| 3 | M Ociesa-*,M Rzeszutek-K Beyer | 7 | NS | 4 | N | 5 | -1 | -100 | 14.29% | 40.82% | ||
| M Ociesa-*,M Rzeszutek-K Beyer | 8 | NS | 4 | E | 5 | +1 | -150 | 78.57% | 45.54% | |||
| M Ociesa-*,M Rzeszutek-K Beyer | 9 | NS | 2 | E | 2 | +1 | -140 | 14.29% | 42.06% | |||
| 4 | M Ociesa-*,J Kurianowicz-J Miakisz | 10 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | +1 | +630 | 42.86% | 42.14% | ||
| M Ociesa-*,J Kurianowicz-J Miakisz | 11 | NS | 3 | E | 3 | = | -110 | 17.36% | 39.89% | |||
| M Ociesa-*,J Kurianowicz-J Miakisz | 12 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | +1 | +630 | 71.21% | 42.50% | |||
| 5 | W Sękowski-A Poznysz,M Ociesa-* | 13 | WE | 4× | W | 5 | -2 | -500 | 35.71% | 41.98% | ||
| W Sękowski-A Poznysz,M Ociesa-* | 14 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | +1 | -170 | 64.29% | 43.57% | |||
| W Sękowski-A Poznysz,M Ociesa-* | 15 | WE | 6× | N | 9 | -1 | +200 | 85.71% | 46.38% | |||
| 6 | M Ociesa-*,M Ciszewski-R Makuch | 16 | NS | 4 | E | 5 | = | -620 | 78.57% | 48.39% | ||
| M Ociesa-*,M Ciszewski-R Makuch | 17 | NS | 2 | E | 2 | = | -110 | 7.14% | 45.97% | |||
| M Ociesa-*,M Ciszewski-R Makuch | 18 | NS | PASS | 0 | 0.00% | 43.41% | ||||||
| 7 | M Ociesa-*,J Molenda-A Winkler | 19 | NS | 2 | N | 5 | = | +110 | 71.43% | 44.89% | ||
| M Ociesa-*,J Molenda-A Winkler | 20 | NS | 2 | E | 2 | = | -110 | 92.86% | 47.29% | |||
| M Ociesa-*,J Molenda-A Winkler | 21 | NS | 2 | E | Q | +2 | -170 | 7.14% | 45.37% | |||
| 8 | M Ociesa-*,Z Patreuha-K Grela | 22 | NS | 5× | S | 5 | = | +550 | 92.86% | 47.53% | ||
| M Ociesa-*,Z Patreuha-K Grela | 23 | NS | 3 | E | 5 | -2 | +200 | 57.14% | 47.95% | |||
| M Ociesa-*,Z Patreuha-K Grela | 24 | NS | 6 | E | 5 | -2 | +100 | 100.00% | 50.12% | |||
| 9 | M Ociesa-*,M Chojnacki-R Menzfeld | 25 | NS | 2 | E | 5 | +2 | -170 | 14.29% | 48.69% | ||
| M Ociesa-*,M Chojnacki-R Menzfeld | 26 | NS | 4 | E | 5 | = | -620 | 57.14% | 49.01% | |||
| M Ociesa-*,M Chojnacki-R Menzfeld | 27 | NS | 2× | E | 5 | +3 | -770 | 0.00% | 47.20% | |||
| 10 | E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk,M Ociesa-* | 28 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | +1 | -630 | 21.43% | 46.28% | ||
| E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk,M Ociesa-* | 29 | WE | 2 | E | K | -1 | -100 | 71.43% | 47.14% | |||
| E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk,M Ociesa-* | 30 | WE | 1 | E | 5 | = | +80 | 85.71% | 48.43% | |||
| 11 | J Małek-R Siwiec,M Ociesa-* | 1 | WE | 1 | N | 5 | = | -90 | 50.00% | 48.48% | ||
| J Małek-R Siwiec,M Ociesa-* | 2 | WE | 3 | W | 2 | +1 | +430 | 57.14% | 48.75% | |||
| J Małek-R Siwiec,M Ociesa-* | 3 | WE | 3 | S | 9 | +1 | -170 | 14.29% | 47.71% | |||
| 12 | M Czolij-E Szafraniec,M Ociesa-* | 4 | WE | 5 | N | 5 | +1 | -680 | 42.86% | 47.56% | ||
| M Czolij-E Szafraniec,M Ociesa-* | 5 | WE | 5 | N | 5 | -1 | +100 | 64.29% | 48.04% | |||
| M Czolij-E Szafraniec,M Ociesa-* | 6 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | +2 | -460 | 50.00% | 48.10% | |||
| 13 | H Pietrzykowska-Z Skórecki,M Ociesa-* | 7 | WE | 3 | E | 5 | = | +140 | 71.43% | 48.73% | ||
| H Pietrzykowska-Z Skórecki,M Ociesa-* | 8 | WE | 2 | E | 5 | +1 | +140 | 100.00% | 50.08% | |||
| H Pietrzykowska-Z Skórecki,M Ociesa-* | 9 | WE | 4× | N | 5 | -1 | +100 | 71.43% | 50.62% | |||
| 14 | B Nowakowski-J Romańczyk,M Ociesa-* | 10 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | = | -110 | 28.57% | 50.07% | ||
| B Nowakowski-J Romańczyk,M Ociesa-* | 11 | WE | 6 | N | 5 | = | -980 | 21.43% | 49.37% | |||
| B Nowakowski-J Romańczyk,M Ociesa-* | 12 | WE | 3 | E | 5 | +1 | +430 | 50.00% | 49.39% | |||
| 15 | A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak,M Ociesa-* | 13 | WE | 5 | E | 5 | -1 | -100 | 14.29% | 48.57% | ||
| A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak,M Ociesa-* | 14 | WE | 3 | N | 3 | +1 | -170 | 64.29% | 48.93% | |||
| A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak,M Ociesa-* | 15 | WE | 3 | E | 2 | = | +140 | 92.86% | 49.90% | |||
| SUMA: | 49.90% | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 53.42% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 51.08% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 21 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2013-12-22 o 19:28:26