| KM MZBS 2013 - finał 106: J Miakisz | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | M Czolij-E Szafraniec,J Kurianowicz-* | 1 | WE | 2![]() | E | 4 | +1 | +150 | 71.43% | 71.43% | ||
| M Czolij-E Szafraniec,J Kurianowicz-* | 2 | WE | 4![]() | N | K | -1 | +100 | 78.57% | 75.00% | |||
| M Czolij-E Szafraniec,J Kurianowicz-* | 3 | WE | 4![]() | W | 8 | = | +620 | 0.00% | 50.00% | |||
| 2 | M Chojnacki-R Menzfeld,J Kurianowicz-* | 4 | WE | 1![]() | E | Q | = | +90 | 7.14% | 39.29% | ||
| M Chojnacki-R Menzfeld,J Kurianowicz-* | 5 | WE | 3![]() | E | J | +1 | +130 | 85.71% | 48.57% | |||
| M Chojnacki-R Menzfeld,J Kurianowicz-* | 6 | WE | 2![]() | S | K | +1 | -110 | 78.57% | 53.57% | |||
| 3 | W Sękowski-A Poznysz,J Kurianowicz-* | 7 | WE | 3![]() | N | 7 | = | -140 | 35.71% | 51.02% | ||
| W Sękowski-A Poznysz,J Kurianowicz-* | 8 | WE | 5![]() | E | Q | +1 | +420 | 57.14% | 51.79% | |||
| W Sękowski-A Poznysz,J Kurianowicz-* | 9 | WE | 2![]() | N | 8 | -1 | +50 | 42.86% | 50.79% | |||
| 4 | M Ociesa-W Siuda,J Kurianowicz-* | 10 | WE | 3![]() | S | 5 | +1 | -630 | 57.14% | 51.43% | ||
| M Ociesa-W Siuda,J Kurianowicz-* | 11 | WE | 3![]() | E | 3 | = | +110 | 82.64% | 54.27% | |||
| M Ociesa-W Siuda,J Kurianowicz-* | 12 | WE | 3![]() | N | 5 | +1 | -630 | 28.79% | 52.14% | |||
| 5 | Z Patreuha-K Grela,J Kurianowicz-* | 13 | WE | 3 × | E | A | = | +730 | 92.86% | 55.27% | ||
| Z Patreuha-K Grela,J Kurianowicz-* | 14 | WE | 4![]() | N | 9 | = | -420 | 21.43% | 52.86% | |||
| Z Patreuha-K Grela,J Kurianowicz-* | 15 | WE | 3![]() | N | 4 | +2 | -660 | 35.71% | 51.71% | |||
| 6 | B Leśniak-M Rajca,J Kurianowicz-* | 16 | WE | 4![]() | E | 10 | +1 | +650 | 71.43% | 52.95% | ||
| B Leśniak-M Rajca,J Kurianowicz-* | 17 | WE | 3![]() | E | A | -1 | -50 | 42.86% | 52.35% | |||
| B Leśniak-M Rajca,J Kurianowicz-* | 18 | WE | 3 × | W | 3 | -2 | -300 | 0.00% | 49.44% | |||
| 7 | J Kurianowicz-*,H Pietrzykowska-Z Skórecki | 19 | NS | 3![]() | S | 9 | -1 | -50 | 35.71% | 48.72% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,H Pietrzykowska-Z Skórecki | 20 | NS | 2![]() | E | 7 | +3 | -210 | 42.86% | 48.43% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,H Pietrzykowska-Z Skórecki | 21 | NS | 2![]() | E | 2 | = | -90 | 85.71% | 50.20% | |||
| 8 | J Kurianowicz-*,J Molenda-A Winkler | 22 | NS | 4![]() | S | A | +1 | +150 | 50.00% | 50.19% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,J Molenda-A Winkler | 23 | NS | 4![]() | E | 9 | -3 | +300 | 85.71% | 51.74% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,J Molenda-A Winkler | 24 | NS | 6![]() | W | K | +1 | -940 | 14.29% | 50.18% | |||
| 9 | J Kurianowicz-*,B Nowakowski-J Romańczyk | 25 | NS | 3![]() | W | K | = | -110 | 85.71% | 51.60% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,B Nowakowski-J Romańczyk | 26 | NS | 3![]() | W | 6 | +2 | -660 | 7.14% | 49.89% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,B Nowakowski-J Romańczyk | 27 | NS | 4![]() | W | 10 | +1 | -450 | 35.71% | 49.37% | |||
| 10 | S Machowski-J Zajączkowski,J Kurianowicz-* | 28 | WE | 3![]() | S | 5 | -1 | +100 | 100.00% | 51.17% | ||
| S Machowski-J Zajączkowski,J Kurianowicz-* | 29 | WE | 3![]() | S | K | = | -110 | 57.14% | 51.38% | |||
| S Machowski-J Zajączkowski,J Kurianowicz-* | 30 | WE | 2![]() | S | K | = | -90 | 50.00% | 51.33% | |||
| 11 | J Kurianowicz-*,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 1 | NS | 2![]() | N | A | +1 | +140 | 85.71% | 52.44% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 2 | NS | 3![]() | W | 5 | +1 | -430 | 42.86% | 52.14% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 3 | NS | 2![]() | S | 3 | +2 | +170 | 85.71% | 53.16% | |||
| 12 | J Kurianowicz-*,E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk | 4 | NS | 5![]() | N | K | +1 | +680 | 57.14% | 53.28% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk | 5 | NS | 4![]() | W | Q | -2 | +100 | 71.43% | 53.80% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk | 6 | NS | 3![]() | S | 5 | +2 | +460 | 50.00% | 53.69% | |||
| 13 | J Kurianowicz-*,M Ciszewski-R Makuch | 7 | NS | 1![]() | E | A | +2 | -140 | 28.57% | 53.01% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,M Ciszewski-R Makuch | 8 | NS | 4![]() | W | 4 | -1 | +50 | 50.00% | 52.93% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,M Ciszewski-R Makuch | 9 | NS | 4![]() | N | Q | -1 | -50 | 50.00% | 52.86% | |||
| 14 | J Kurianowicz-*,J Małek-R Siwiec | 10 | NS | 1 × | N | K | -1 | -200 | 14.29% | 51.89% | ||
| J Kurianowicz-*,J Małek-R Siwiec | 11 | NS | 6![]() | N | 2 | = | +980 | 78.57% | 52.54% | |||
| J Kurianowicz-*,J Małek-R Siwiec | 12 | NS | 6![]() | W | A | = | -920 | 0.00% | 51.29% | |||
| 15 | M Rzeszutek-K Beyer,J Kurianowicz-* | 13 | WE | 5![]() | E | A | = | +600 | 85.71% | 52.09% | ||
| M Rzeszutek-K Beyer,J Kurianowicz-* | 14 | WE | 2![]() | N | 4 | +2 | -170 | 64.29% | 52.37% | |||
| M Rzeszutek-K Beyer,J Kurianowicz-* | 15 | WE | 3 × | E | Q | -1 | -100 | 14.29% | 51.52% | |||
| SUMA: | 51.52% | |||||||||||
| C-OVER: | 54.19% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 52.41% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 17 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2013-12-22 o 19:28:26