KM MZBS 2013 - finał 15: M Chojnacki | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-R Menzfeld,E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk | 1 | NS | 3 | W | 7 | -1 | +50 | 78.57% | 78.57% | ||
*-R Menzfeld,E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk | 2 | NS | 4 | N | J | -1 | -100 | 21.43% | 50.00% | |||
*-R Menzfeld,E Kasiński-L Urbańczyk | 3 | NS | 3 | W | 5 | +2 | -660 | 21.43% | 40.48% | |||
2 | *-R Menzfeld,J Kurianowicz-J Miakisz | 4 | NS | 1 | E | Q | = | -90 | 92.86% | 53.57% | ||
*-R Menzfeld,J Kurianowicz-J Miakisz | 5 | NS | 3 | E | J | +1 | -130 | 14.29% | 45.71% | |||
*-R Menzfeld,J Kurianowicz-J Miakisz | 6 | NS | 2 | S | K | +1 | +110 | 21.43% | 41.67% | |||
3 | *-R Menzfeld,J Małek-R Siwiec | 7 | NS | 3 | N | 2 | = | +140 | 64.29% | 44.90% | ||
*-R Menzfeld,J Małek-R Siwiec | 8 | NS | 5× | S | K | -3 | -500 | 21.43% | 41.96% | |||
*-R Menzfeld,J Małek-R Siwiec | 9 | NS | 1 | N | K | +1 | +90 | 92.86% | 47.62% | |||
4 | J Molenda-A Winkler,*-R Menzfeld | 10 | WE | 6 | S | J | -2 | +200 | 100.00% | 52.86% | ||
J Molenda-A Winkler,*-R Menzfeld | 11 | WE | 2 | S | A | = | -110 | 9.21% | 48.89% | |||
J Molenda-A Winkler,*-R Menzfeld | 12 | WE | 3× | N | 7 | -2 | +500 | 99.00% | 53.07% | |||
5 | *-R Menzfeld,H Pietrzykowska-Z Skórecki | 13 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | = | +600 | 85.71% | 55.58% | ||
*-R Menzfeld,H Pietrzykowska-Z Skórecki | 14 | NS | 4 | N | 5 | = | +420 | 78.57% | 57.22% | |||
*-R Menzfeld,H Pietrzykowska-Z Skórecki | 15 | NS | 3 | N | 4 | +3 | +690 | 85.71% | 59.12% | |||
6 | *-R Menzfeld,B Nowakowski-J Romańczyk | 16 | NS | 4 | E | 5 | = | -620 | 78.57% | 60.33% | ||
*-R Menzfeld,B Nowakowski-J Romańczyk | 17 | NS | 2 | W | 4 | = | -110 | 7.14% | 57.21% | |||
*-R Menzfeld,B Nowakowski-J Romańczyk | 18 | NS | 3 | N | 6 | +1 | +130 | 85.71% | 58.79% | |||
7 | *-R Menzfeld,S Machowski-J Zajączkowski | 19 | NS | 3 | S | 6 | = | +140 | 85.71% | 60.21% | ||
*-R Menzfeld,S Machowski-J Zajączkowski | 20 | NS | 3 | E | 2 | +1 | -630 | 7.14% | 57.55% | |||
*-R Menzfeld,S Machowski-J Zajączkowski | 21 | NS | 3 | E | Q | = | -140 | 35.71% | 56.51% | |||
8 | *-R Menzfeld,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 22 | NS | 5× | S | 8 | = | +550 | 92.86% | 58.17% | ||
*-R Menzfeld,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 23 | NS | 1 | E | 9 | -2 | +200 | 57.14% | 58.12% | |||
*-R Menzfeld,A Ochot-A Kaźmierczak | 24 | NS | 6 | W | K | +1 | -940 | 14.29% | 56.29% | |||
9 | M Ociesa-W Siuda,*-R Menzfeld | 25 | WE | 2 | E | 5 | +2 | +170 | 85.71% | 57.47% | ||
M Ociesa-W Siuda,*-R Menzfeld | 26 | WE | 4 | E | 5 | = | +620 | 42.86% | 56.91% | |||
M Ociesa-W Siuda,*-R Menzfeld | 27 | WE | 2× | E | 5 | +3 | +770 | 100.00% | 58.51% | |||
10 | Z Patreuha-K Grela,*-R Menzfeld | 28 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | +1 | -630 | 21.43% | 57.18% | ||
Z Patreuha-K Grela,*-R Menzfeld | 29 | WE | 1 | S | K | +1 | -120 | 35.71% | 56.44% | |||
Z Patreuha-K Grela,*-R Menzfeld | 30 | WE | 2× | W | 4 | -3 | -500 | 0.00% | 54.56% | |||
11 | M Ciszewski-R Makuch,*-R Menzfeld | 1 | WE | 1 | N | 5 | = | -90 | 50.00% | 54.41% | ||
M Ciszewski-R Makuch,*-R Menzfeld | 2 | WE | 6 | E | A | -2 | -100 | 0.00% | 52.71% | |||
M Ciszewski-R Makuch,*-R Menzfeld | 3 | WE | 2 | S | A | +2 | -170 | 14.29% | 51.55% | |||
12 | M Rzeszutek-K Beyer,*-R Menzfeld | 4 | WE | 2 | N | K | +4 | -230 | 100.00% | 52.97% | ||
M Rzeszutek-K Beyer,*-R Menzfeld | 5 | WE | 5 | S | A | -1 | +100 | 64.29% | 53.30% | |||
M Rzeszutek-K Beyer,*-R Menzfeld | 6 | WE | 6 | S | A | -2 | +100 | 100.00% | 54.59% | |||
13 | M Czolij-E Szafraniec,*-R Menzfeld | 7 | WE | 2 | N | 4 | +1 | -140 | 14.29% | 53.50% | ||
M Czolij-E Szafraniec,*-R Menzfeld | 8 | WE | 4 | W | 7 | -1 | -50 | 50.00% | 53.41% | |||
M Czolij-E Szafraniec,*-R Menzfeld | 9 | WE | 4 | N | Q | = | -420 | 7.14% | 52.23% | |||
14 | W Sękowski-A Poznysz,*-R Menzfeld | 10 | WE | 1 | E | 10 | -1 | -100 | 42.86% | 51.99% | ||
W Sękowski-A Poznysz,*-R Menzfeld | 11 | WE | 6 | N | A | = | -980 | 21.43% | 51.25% | |||
W Sękowski-A Poznysz,*-R Menzfeld | 12 | WE | 3 | E | J | +1 | +430 | 50.00% | 51.22% | |||
15 | B Leśniak-M Rajca,*-R Menzfeld | 13 | WE | 4 | E | A | +1 | +150 | 42.86% | 51.02% | ||
B Leśniak-M Rajca,*-R Menzfeld | 14 | WE | 4 | S | 5 | = | -420 | 0.00% | 49.86% | |||
B Leśniak-M Rajca,*-R Menzfeld | 15 | WE | 2 | E | 10 | = | +110 | 50.00% | 49.87% | |||
SUMA: | 49.87% | |||||||||||
C-OVER: | 59.71% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 53.15% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 11 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2013-12-22 o 19:28:26